Skip to main content

Wikis vs Blogs

In today's world, everyone wants a voice. Due to the great tool of the internet, that desire can turn into reality. Whether it is sharing our personal opinion or view on something or if it's to add some factual research we have found to add to a topic discussion, sharing is sharing.

That is where the distinction between Wiki and Blog comes into play. The latter, blogs, is used to give someone the ability to share their own experiences, their opinions and their views on pop culture or niche topics. It is a tremendous tool to gather a good sense of an argument by viewing different perspectives and a great way to understand other peoples POV. For example, in the article "Brooklyn Blog Helps Lead to Drug Raid" people began to share their experiences of drug deals and fights that happened within a neighborhood. The combination of a few peoples experiences and perspectives led to a drug bust by the police of crack houses. It is also another example of understanding peoples POV, from the outside-in an upper-middle-class student who doesn't understand the neighborhood of crackhouses gets a look into their lives through a blog.

Wiki is also another way of sharing information with the addition of peer to peer editing. For Wiki, the collaboration mostly deals with research and more factual additions to an argument. In blogs, you can simply share your opinion or perspective. However, on a Wiki page, it is generally used to add arguments backed with research and facts that agree or counter the arguments presented on the Wiki page. For example, on Wikipedia comments that aren't backed by a reliable source or aren't relevant to the topic is deleted. The article "An Internal Wiki That’s Not Classified" shows an efficient use of Wiki. It showed how the State Department use wiki sites to share information to employees efficiently, in this case, biographies of important people who will attend an important meeting. It shows how vital proper and factual information must be added to the Wikis so the patrons using these Wiki pages as references don't embarrass themselves with lousy information.

Sources: https://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/04/business/media/04link.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/26/nyregion/26bayridge.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Privacy

Privacy and confidentiality are very important issues that new media faces on a daily basis. My paper was on Wikipedia, as part of new media Wiki formats have been very popular and adopted through many organizations. Two problems Wiki faces is exactly the privacy of the information and the user's personal information shared throughout the organization. New media allows companies to store vital information about the firm, customers, and employees. That vital information must be secured because it is easily accessible by hackers. Also, new media allows filesharing throughout the internal organization that must have high confidentiality standards because it can be given to the wrong hand or even intercepted by a third party. Whoever adopts any sort of new media must look into how to protect its privacy and make sure there are no holes in the system. 

46-year-old CEO bets $44.2 billion on 1 stock

Netflix briefly passed Disney as the biggest entertainment company in 2018, and analysts and investors alike celebrated a new dawn in the entertainment world. But what these press clippings missed was the bigger story. Because we think Netflix is NOT the future of entertainment. It’s only a small fraction. With PwC estimating the media landscape to be worth an estimated $2.2 trillion in 2021, and Netflix revenue passing $11 billion last year, you’ll see that Netflix makes up only 0.5% of the media landscape. And one billionaire CEO is taking charge of what Netflix DOESN’T do and leading the way for the Next Generation of entertainment. You see, Netflix is a streaming company through and through, and they’re great at that. But this 46-year-old CEO is putting over $44 billion on the table to take over the rest of the market, and he isn’t stopping any time soon. His forward-thinking company, which many people haven’t even heard of before, doesn’t only want to ...

Next New

I think we should have a new media that creates a virtual device that allows us to shop in stores virtually instead of buying online. Imagine, at home, you can virtually walk around Whole Foods or Macy's in current time and you can browse around and see the details of the clothing or the quality of the produce. This can be a better experience buying online when you order something and it is nothing like the pictures in person. It would also help companies promote new products to the new generation that shop online but don't browse in stores to find new things. You can also make virtual stores not actual. Just a more better way to shop online.